Better Communication Skills — for Better Leaders
August 20, 2009 by admin
Filed under Leadership
Introduction
The challenge of better communication skills has spawned books, seminars and many a consulting company. How can it be addressed in a short article like this?
Treat this, and other articles like it, as a tip. This is a brief education in a couple of important aspects of effective communications. No theory here; this is real observation and advice. Put it to use, and you’ll be a more effective leader.
The Communications Mystique
“What we have here is a failure to communicate”. Are you old enough, like me, to remember that line from the movie Cool Hand Luke? Even if you’re not, you’ve heard some version of that line if you’ve been in business.
Hardly any missed milestone, production problem, or customer service failure hasn’t been at least partly explained as a communications problem.
What’s so difficult about communications?
Nothing, really. Whether it’s one to one, one to many or many to many, communication is nothing more than conversation. Somebody’s speaking, and somebody’s listening (hopefully).
Gaining better communication skills involves developing the ability to observe the conversations taking place, and make adjustments so that the speaking and the listening are both being done effectively. That doesn’t sound so tough, does it? Well, it’s a little harder when you’re observing your own conversations. But it’s still possible!
The First Secret to Better Communication Skills
Have the conversation! It’s amazing how often the “failure to communicate” is just that — a failure to even hold an important conversation. Leaders assume people know what needs to be done. People assume leaders understand the obstacles they face.
Or if assumptions aren’t getting in the way, sometimes the problem is reluctance. After all, some conversations are tough to have. It’s not easy to tell someone that you disagree with them. Worse yet, maybe you’re angry with them because you feel they’ve let you down failed to live up to an agreement.
If you’re the leader, your team may be reluctant to bring you bad news. They may be very reluctant to disagree with you or challenge your position. After all, career ******* is not usually on the path to success and happiness.
The Leader’s Role in Fostering Better Communication Skills
Make it safe. Encourage people to bring you bad news, and to challenge you. Let the organization know when it’s done and done well. Acknowledge the people who stepped up and took the risk. Do this even if you disagree with their points. In fact, do this especially when you disagree with their points.
If people see that they can make an argument and be appreciated for it, even when they don’t win the argument, the level of dialogue will step up. You as a leader have become a better communicator by exhibiting the behaviors that reward just holding the important conversations.
The Next Level of Better Communication Skills – Observe
Look around the organization. Pay attention to the dialogue. You’re looking for one of three things:
Silence — People withdrawing and not contributing to the conversation. Some are shy and need their confidence built. Some are avoiding conflict and need to know it’s ok. All need to understand that they’re on the team because they bring needed talents. And their talents need to be part of the dialogue.
Violence — People dominating the conversation and not allowing others’ views to be heard or considered. Counsel these people. Help them understand that dialogue is not a contest to see who wins. It’s a process to get out as much relevant information as possible. This is especially important because when you have people who are prone to go silent, someone who dominates or goes violent makes it easy for the others to hide.
Real Dialogue — The free flow of ideas, effective debate and discussion, and ultimately a team that stakes out a position and where the members support one another. It sounds ideal and not everyone gets there, but work at it by creating an environment that’s safe for dialogue, and you’ll be amazed at the results.
Better Communication Skills — Silence and Violence
August 8, 2009 by admin
Filed under Leadership
Introduction
Leaders need to seek better communication skills not only for themselves and their leadership teams, but as part of the organization’s culture. Successful change management requires getting everyone moving in one new direction.
People will be talking with one another while you’re trying to drive change. As a leader, you want to make sure those conversations are out in the open so that objections can be addressed and people will grow confident in your leadership.
Better Communication Skills at the Organization Level
What do we mean when we talk about the communication skills of an organization? At the individual level, we know how to describe communication skills. We talk about someone’s style, their subject matter knowledge, their ability to adapt their message to their target audience, their preparation, etc.
In an organization, better communication skills are something we seek to build in the culture. To be specific, we’re seeking to create a cultural norm of frequent, open dialogue. When that’s the norm, people feel safe in raising concerns and objections, knowing that they will be heard.
They also recognize that they are obligated to participate in dialogue, whether in meetings or less formally among their peers. It’s part of their job, making sure they are contributing not only their labor but their expertise, insight and ideas whenever possible.
Leaders need to look out for the two biggest barriers to better communication skills in an organization: silence and violence.
Recognizing Silence
Very simply, silence means people are not participating in the dialogue. Said another way, important conversations are not happening because people are choosing not to engage in them.
Why is silence a problem?
Hopefully you’ve hired smart people. It only makes sense, then, that you want and need the insights of those smart people when you’re leading a change program. Smart people always have thoughts and opinions. When they go silent, you lose the benefit of knowing those thoughts and opinions.
Besides not having the input, when people are silent you don’t know where they stand. Do they understand what you are trying to accomplish? Are they committed to working with you and your team, or do they have reservations? Without clear understanding and commitment, how will you bring these people along with you?
Addressing Silence
First and foremost, make sure you’ve created an environment where it’s safe to speak out. Many people who turn to silence do so because they feel they may be ignored or worse yet criticized for speaking up.
Examine your behavior — what do you do when you are challenged? Do you fight back right away? Or do you give considered answers and act respectful when you disagree with the challenger? Check the same behaviors in your leadership team, and within the organization in general. You’ve got to make it safe for people to engage. Your behavior will set the tone.
If you’re sure it’s safe and you see individuals are still reluctant to add their input to the dialogue of the organization, coach them individually. Let them know how much their input is valued and needed, and thank them when they open up.
Recognizing Violence
In this context, violence can be described as the tendency of one or a few individuals to dominate conversations. When there is violence, there is no chance for open dialogue. The dominators, if there are more than one, may argue their points without effectively listening to one another. And those who are not dominating the conversation will end up going silent, out of frustration or boredom.
So in the end, violence begets silence. How do you address violence?
As a leader, maintain your own objectivity. You’re a participant in the conversations taking place, but you must also be an observer. Learn to step out of the discussion from time to time and assess what’s happening. If you observe individuals dominating to the point where others are checking out, you need to intervene.
The degree of intervention depends on just how “violent” the dialogue is getting. It can be as simple as reminding someone to ease up a little and open themselves up to push back from others. Or it can go all the way to having to call a time out and taking people aside to help them see that their passion is overwhelming others and suppressing good dialogue.
The Result of Silence and Violence
One of two things is going to happen when you don’t have open dialogue in which everyone is actively engaged.
You’ll stall. Some strong people will argue and debate ad infinitum, while others check out. And your change strategy goes no where.
You’ll move forward. Not everyone will be participating, but strong people will drive and dominate the dialogue and the resulting actions.
Stalling will be very clear to you, and you’ll need to intervene to create safety, get people engaged, help break logjams, etc.
Moving forward might not seem so bad, but beware. Depending on just how many people have gone silent, there may be a time bomb in your implementation plan. When things go wrong, as they do in any change initiative, there will be a number of people who will have effectively positioned themselves to wash their hands of all responsibility.
As we noted earlier, just because they go silent doesn’t mean they don’t have input and opinions. When the plan goes forward and they’ve been shouted down, or chose not to engage because they felt it wasn’t safe, they will be in a position to say “that wasn’t my idea”.
Even though such behavior should be unacceptable, it happens way too often. Prevent it by setting expectations around organizational communication, specifically creating a shared value for open, honest dialogue without repercussion or disrespect.




